Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Date
Msg-id 20190719001919.GA1859@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> > I went ahead and committed this using Thomas's suggestion to remove the
> > parentheses.
>
> The commit message claims this was back-patched, but I see no back-patch?
>
> (The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-committers
> list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)

REL_12_STABLE has been missed in the set of branches patched.  Could
you fix that as well (including the extra fix b0a7e0f0)?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck