Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Date
Msg-id 16949.1563485795@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> I went ahead and committed this using Thomas's suggestion to remove the
> parentheses.

The commit message claims this was back-patched, but I see no back-patch?

(The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-committers
list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds