Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load
Date
Msg-id 20190705173639.GA358@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jul-05, Tom Lane wrote:

> FWIW, I don't think there's a need for every catversion on the back branch
> to look older than any catversion on HEAD.  The requirement so far as the
> core code is concerned is only for non-equality.  Now, extension code does
> often do something like "if catversion >= xxx", but in practice they're
> only concerned about numbers used by released versions.

pg_upgrade also uses >= catversion comparison for a couple of things.  I
don't think it affects this case, but it's worth keeping in mind.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Next
From: Paul A Jungwirth
Date:
Subject: Re: range_agg