Hi,
On 2019-06-01 15:09:46 -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While going through the table AM callbacks, I have bumped into a
> couple of references to heap. I think that we should make that more
> generic by using the term "table" as done when opening relations and
> such. Attached is a cleanup patch.
I'm unbothered by this, but I'm also not opposed to changing this. It's
largely just keeping the previous code / comment.
> While on it, I found a set of typos which looked like a copy-pasto
> which got spread => "index_nfo".
Yea, we should fix this.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
