On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 12:22:10PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-06-01 15:09:46 -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> While going through the table AM callbacks, I have bumped into a
>> couple of references to heap. I think that we should make that more
>> generic by using the term "table" as done when opening relations and
>> such. Attached is a cleanup patch.
>
> I'm unbothered by this, but I'm also not opposed to changing this. It's
> largely just keeping the previous code / comment.
>
>> While on it, I found a set of typos which looked like a copy-pasto
>> which got spread => "index_nfo".
>
> Yea, we should fix this.
Thanks. Do you mind if I fix both then?
--
Michael
