Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names
Date
Msg-id 20190523233224.qn7rbad62hnsem5v@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names  (Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>)
Responses Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names  (Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On 2019-05-14 12:11:46 -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> Thank you. Please find the patch to rename the agreed functions. It would
> be good to make all consistent instead of applying exception to three
> functions but seems no consensus on it. Given table_ api are new, we could
> modify them leaving systable_ ones as is, but as objections left that as is.

I've pushed a slightly modified version (rebase, some additional
newlines due to the longer function names) now. Thanks for the patch!

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: No mention of no CIC support for partitioned index in docs
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump throwing "column number -1 is out of range 0..36" on HEAD