On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 04:12:56PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> I modified the "get_password_type" function to perform a SCRAM
> verification to see if it is a properly hashed SCRAM password. If it is,
> we treat the password as a SCRAM hashed one. Otherwise, we proceed to
> the next step, which is to treat it as a plainly stored one.
Since v10, we don't allow the storage of plain verifiers so if a
string does not match what we think is a correct SCRAM or MD5
verifier, then it should be processed according to
password_encryption when storing the verifier or processed according
to the auth protocol with the HBA entry matching. Your patch looks
fine to me, I would have just added a test case in password.sql (no
need to send a new patch I can take care of it).
Any objections to back-patch that stuff to v10?
--
Michael
