On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:06:09AM -0400, Hugh Ranalli wrote:
> I'm not sure I'd classify the second change as "irrelevant." Using "with"
> is the standard and recommended practice for working with files in Python.
I honestly don't know about any standard way to do anythings in
Python, but it is true that using "with" saves from a forgotten
close() call.
> At the moment the script does nothing to close the open data file, whether
> through regular processing or in the case of an exception. I would argue
> that's a bug and should be fixed. Creating a separate patch for that seems
> to be adding work for no reason.
This script runs in a short-lived context, so it is really not a big
deal to not close the opened UnicodeData.txt. I agree that it is bad
practice though, so I think it's fine to fix the problem if there is
another patch touching the same area of the code while on it.
--
Michael
