Re: A few new options for vacuumdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Date
Msg-id 20190127133301.GA15401@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A few new options for vacuumdb  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:49:28AM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> Oh, wow.  Thanks for pointing this out.  I should have caught this.
> With 0002, we are basically just throwing out the column lists
> entirely as we obtain the qualified identifiers from the catalog
> query.  To fix this, I've added an optional CTE for tracking any
> provided column lists.  v5-0001 is your test patch for this case, and
> v5-0002 splits out the work for split_table_columns_spec().

Committed the test portion for now, still reviewing the rest..
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN