Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN
Date
Msg-id 31907.1548600999@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN  (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> I guess the main question is; does anybody care about builds on a 20 year old netbsd/mipsel dinosaur?  I noticed
thereare now mips64el and mips64eb build-farm members. 

I tend to think that variety in the buildfarm is intrinsically a good
thing.  I'd rather see you continue to run the thing, perhaps with a
newer netbsd version if that will resolve the problem.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: A few new options for vacuumdb
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info