Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Glyn Astill
Subject Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN
Date
Msg-id 1970445535.2776083.1548584960750@mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Opossum vs. float4 NaN  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> On Saturday, 26 January 2019, 16:00:24 GMT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking we should regretfully retire opossum, unless there's
>> a software update available for it that fixes this bug.

I'm happy to update opossum to see if the issue goes away; likewise I'm just as happy to retire it completely.  It'll still come online occasionally regardless, so makes no difference.

I guess the main question is; does anybody care about builds on a 20 year old netbsd/mipsel dinosaur?  I noticed there are now mips64el and mips64eb build-farm members.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonpath