Re: btree.sgml typo? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: btree.sgml typo?
Date
Msg-id 20190107.141042.668568118940696696.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: btree.sgml typo?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: btree.sgml typo?  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 1:35 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>>   <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> includes an implementation of the
>>   standard <acronym>btree</acronym> (multi-way binary tree) index data
>>   structure.
>>
>> I think the term "btree" here means "multi-way balanced tree", rather
>> than "multi-way binary tree". In fact in our btree, there could be
>> more than one key in a node. Patch attached.
> 
> +1 for applying this patch. The existing wording is highly confusing,
> especially because many people already incorrectly think that a B-Tree
> is just like a self-balancing binary search tree.
> 
> There is no consensus on exactly what the "b" actually stands for, but
> it's definitely not "binary". I suppose that the original author meant
> that a B-Tree is a generalization of a binary tree, which is basically
> true -- though that's a very academic point.

Any objection for this? If not, I will commit the patch to master and
REL_11_STABLE branches (btree.sgml first appeared in PostgreSQL 11).

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: error message when subscriptiontarget is a partitioned table
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics