Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type
Date
Msg-id 20181113000820.GB1336@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type  (John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:42:45PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Looks like it. A quick search revealed "parallel worker" and "logical
> replication worker". src/test/modules/ also show "test_shm_mq" and
> "worker_spi", but it seems those don't need to be publicly documented.
> If that sounds right I'll update the patch to include the first two.

Just wondering: do we actually need to include in the docs this list at
all?  This is a recipe to forget its update each time a new backend type
is added.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Removal of unnecessary CommandCounterIncrement() when doing ONCOMMIT DELETE ROWS
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Copy data to DSA area