Re: automatic restore point - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: automatic restore point
Date
Msg-id 20181001220632.7a4jnzph2cwntq6w@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: automatic restore point  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: automatic restore point
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Oct-01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> The following appears to work:
> 
> CREATE FUNCTION evt_automatic_restart_point() RETURNS event_trigger
> LANGUAGE plpgsql
> AS $$
> BEGIN
>   PERFORM pg_create_restore_point(tg_tag);
> END
> $$;
> 
> CREATE EVENT TRIGGER automatic_restart_point ON ddl_command_start
>     EXECUTE PROCEDURE evt_automatic_restart_point();
> 
> Are there any concerns about this?

Mumble.

Re-reading the implementation in standard_ProcessUtility, I wonder what
is PROCESS_UTILITY_QUERY_NONATOMIC -- there seems to be a maze through
SPI that determines whether this flag is set or not, which could affect
whether the event trigger is useful.  Are utilities executed through a
procedure detected by event triggers?  If so, then this mechanism seems
good enough to me.  But if there's a way to sneak utility commands (DROP
TABLE) without the event trigger being invoked, then no (and in that
case maybe it's just a bug in procedures and we can still not include
this patch).

(Grepping for "atomic" is unsurprisingly unhelpful.  I really wish we
didn't use plain words as struct member names ...)

On the TRUNCATE case it's a bit annoying that you can't do it with event
triggers -- you have to create individual regular triggers on truncate
for each table (so you probably need yet another event trigger that
creates such triggers).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd 9.4, 9.3 buildfarm failure on s390x
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd 9.4, 9.3 buildfarm failure on s390x