On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:16:42AM +0300, Arseny Sher wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:31:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Could it be possible to get a patch from all the feedback and exchange
>>> gathered here? Petr, I think that it would not hurt if you use the set
>>> of words and comments you think is most adapted as the primary author of
>>> the feature.
>>
>> I have seen no patch, so attached is one to finally close the loop and
>> this open item, which includes both my suggestions and what Arseny has
>> mentioned based on the latest emails exchanged. Any objections to that?
>
> I'm practically happy with this.
>
>> * while confirmed_lsn is used as base point for the decoding context.
>
> This line is excessive as now we have comment below saying it doesn't
> matter.
Okay, let's do as you suggest then. Do you find the attached adapted?
--
Michael
