On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:28:43PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> > On 06/20/2018 05:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:06:20AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> > > Even if they are encrypted with the same key, they use different
> > > initialization vectors that are stored inside the encrypted payload, so
> > > you really can't identify much except the length, as Robert stated.
>
> Definitely use different IVs, and don't reuse them (or use cipher modes
> where IV reuse is not fatal).
>
> > The more you encrypt with a single key, the more fuel you give to the
> > person trying to solve for the key with cryptanalysis.
>
> With modern 128-bit block ciphers in modern cipher modes you'd have to
> encrypt enough data to make this not a problem. On the other hand,
> you'll still have other reasons to do key rotation. Key rotation
> ultimately means re-encrypting everything. Getting all of this right is
> very difficult.
>
> So again, what's the threat model? Because if it's sysadmins/DBAs
> you're afraid of, there are better things to do.
Agreed. Databases just don't match to the typical cryptographic
solutions and threat models.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
