Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round two
Date
Msg-id 20180524051915.GO30060@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round two  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round two  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:30:40AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Justin.
> 
> Thanks for writing the patch.  I have a couple of comments.

Thanks for your review, find attached updated patch.

> +    possible to show the difference between a plan whose partitions have been
> +    pruned and one whose partitions haven't.  A typical unoptimized plan for
> +    this type of table setup is:
> 
> "a plan whose partitions have been pruned" sounds a bit off; maybe, "a
> plan in which partitions have been pruned".

I wrote:

"[...] a plan for which partitions have been pruned and for which they have
not."

Cheers,
Justin

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG11 jit failing on ppc64el
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: SPI/backend equivalent of extended-query Describe(statement)?