On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:30:40AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Justin.
>
> Thanks for writing the patch. I have a couple of comments.
Thanks for your review, find attached updated patch.
> + possible to show the difference between a plan whose partitions have been
> + pruned and one whose partitions haven't. A typical unoptimized plan for
> + this type of table setup is:
>
> "a plan whose partitions have been pruned" sounds a bit off; maybe, "a
> plan in which partitions have been pruned".
I wrote:
"[...] a plan for which partitions have been pruned and for which they have
not."
Cheers,
Justin
