Pushed. I made a couple of minor changes, in particular I added the
word "one" to this sentence, which was already under discussion:
On 2018-May-24, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:30:40AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > + possible to show the difference between a plan whose partitions have been
> > + pruned and one whose partitions haven't. A typical unoptimized plan for
> > + this type of table setup is:
> >
> > "a plan whose partitions have been pruned" sounds a bit off; maybe, "a
> > plan in which partitions have been pruned".
>
> I wrote:
>
> "[...] a plan for which partitions have been pruned and for which they have
> not."
"it's possible to show the difference between a plan for which partitions have
been pruned and *one* for which they have not."
Thanks!
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
