On 2018-05-22 11:55:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > while it might not look too scary by itself, it gets a bit more so
> > when you learn that the cur_lineno is only 32 bits wide. This will
> > result in skipping a tuple every time the 32-bit variable wraps back
> > around to 0 again.
>
> Hm, so why is the correct rowcount returned --- are we running
> a separate counter for that purpose, and if so why?
Yes, it's a local counter in CopyFrom/CopyTo. It's probably not
entirely trivial to unify the two. The batching etc makes us modify
cur_lineno in a bit weird ways at times. It's noteworthy that the
comment for cur_lineno says: /* line number for error messages */
Greetings,
Andres Freund
