Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id 20180511063605.GA16028@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:59:27PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/05/11 2:13, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> David G. Johnston wrote:
>>>> As a user I don't really need to know which model is implemented and the
>>>> name doesn't necessarily imply the implementation.  Pruning seems to be the
>>>> commonly-used term for this feature and we should stick with that.
>>>
>>> I agree with this conclusion.  So we have it right and we shouldn't
>>> change it.
>>
>> +1.
>
> +1 from me too.

+1.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?