Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id 5b60e182-106a-6970-9352-8cf3e7bc9c0d@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2018/05/11 2:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> David G. Johnston wrote:
>>> As a user I don't really need to know which model is implemented and the
>>> name doesn't necessarily imply the implementation.  Pruning seems to be the
>>> commonly-used term for this feature and we should stick with that.
>>
>> I agree with this conclusion.  So we have it right and we shouldn't
>> change it.
> 
> +1.

+1 from me too.

Thanks,
Amit

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PANIC during crash recovery of a recently promoted standby
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes