Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaMutP5Uph=wyC8DWBSC1FzsoWUk52yrdxXth7h1TWk4w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> David G. Johnston wrote:
>> As a user I don't really need to know which model is implemented and the
>> name doesn't necessarily imply the implementation.  Pruning seems to be the
>> commonly-used term for this feature and we should stick with that.
>
> I agree with this conclusion.  So we have it right and we shouldn't
> change it.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Douglas Doole
Date:
Subject: ts_rewrite in 10.4
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4