ts_rewrite in 10.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Douglas Doole
Subject ts_rewrite in 10.4
Date
Msg-id CADE5jYJkHGcoCB6ytAq2UO2kAGEpYuxD3w6+xCn5YRzQE+1GRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
As I was double checking that the new function marking from 10.4 merged correctly to our fork, I noticed that one of the ts_rewrite entries looks wrong.

The release notes say:
ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.ts_rewrite(tsquery, tsquery, tsquery) PARALLEL UNSAFE;

But when I pull pg_proc.h from 10.4, I find:
DATA(insert OID = 3684 (  ts_rewrite PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s 3 0 3615 "3615 3615 3615" ...

Which I think means the function is still marked parallel safe. Am I missing something?

- Doug
Salesforce

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?