On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:38:15 +0300
Vitaliy Garnashevich <vgarnashevich@gmail.com> wrote:
> We're going to try using "SELECT 1 FROM table FOR KEY SHARE" for each of
> the tables, which are referenced by results, before running the big
> query. That should be up to a million of rows in total. It will probably
> not cover the case when a record is INSERT'ed and then DELETE'd after
> the calculation has begun, but such cases should be even more rare than
> the DELETE's we're currently facing.
Thing about using a couple of Materialized Views for the worst
part of it.
--
Steven Lembark 1505 National Ave
Workhorse Computing Rockford, IL 61103
lembark@wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508
