Re: Built-in connection pooling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Built-in connection pooling
Date
Msg-id 20180419205921.ydl6z7z7sy6ibvxv@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Vladimir Borodin <root@simply.name>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-04-19 15:01:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Only after you can say "there's nothing wrong with this that isn't
> directly connected to its not being in-core" does it make sense to try
> to push the logic into core.

I think there's plenty things that don't really make sense solving
outside of postgres:
- additional added hop / context switches due to external pooler
- temporary tables
- prepared statements
- GUCs and other session state

I think there's at least one thing that we should attempt to make
easier for external pooler:
- proxy authorization

I think in an "ideal world" there's two kinds of poolers: Dumb ones
further out from the database (for short lived processes, keeping the
total number of connections sane, etc) and then more intelligent one
closer to the database.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Repeated crashes in GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY tests
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes