Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Date
Msg-id 20180330015145.pvsr6kjtf6tw4uwe@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-03-30 10:35:48 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> 0002-0004 is new, in response to the comment that caches other
> than the catcache ought to get the same feature. These can be a
> separate development from 0001 for v12. I don't find a measures
> to catch the all case at once.
> 
> If we agree on the point. I wish to discuss only 0001 for v11.

I'd personally not want to commit a solution for catcaches without also
commiting a solution for a least relcaches in the same release cycle. I
think this patch simply has missed the window for v11.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (commonstar schema problem)