Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan
Date
Msg-id 20180301221052.3jo5uayej2eqqsue@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2018-01-23 17:08:56 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2018-01-22 23:15 GMT+01:00 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>:
> > This really could use a new thread, imv.  This thread is a year old and
> > about a completely different feature than what you've implemented here.
> >
> 
> true, but now it is too late

At the very least the CF entry could be renamed moved out the procedual
language category?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: "failed to find parent tuple for heap-only tuple" error as anERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTION ereport()
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11