Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRCX_7UJ6Rfg+FD3X49YWJL9-KSEebK9CfSOCQ9RU1kCmA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers


2018-03-01 23:10 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
On 2018-01-23 17:08:56 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2018-01-22 23:15 GMT+01:00 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>:
> > This really could use a new thread, imv.  This thread is a year old and
> > about a completely different feature than what you've implemented here.
> >
>
> true, but now it is too late

At the very least the CF entry could be renamed moved out the procedual
language category?

Why not? Have you idea, what category is best?

Regards

Pavel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative