Hi,
On 2018-02-25 21:39:46 +0300, Yura Sokolov wrote:
> > If that's the case then does it really make sense to make this change..?
>
> I don't think it is really necessary to implement generic version
> through templated.
Why?
> Updated numbers are (same benchmark on same notebook, but with new
> master, new ubuntu and later patch version) (average among 6 runs):
>
> master - 16135tps
> with templated qsort - 16199tps
> with bucket sort - 16956tps
>
> Difference is still measurable, but less significant. I don't know why.
>
> Rebased version of first patch (qsorted tamplate) is in atttach.
Hm, that's a bit underwhelming. It's nice to deduplicate, but 16135tps
-> 16199tps is barely statistically significant?
- Andres
