01.03.2018 22:22, Andres Freund пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-02-25 21:39:46 +0300, Yura Sokolov wrote:
>>> If that's the case then does it really make sense to make this change..?
>>
>> I don't think it is really necessary to implement generic version
>> through templated.
>
> Why?
It is better to replace use of generic version with templated in
appropriate places.
Generic version uses variable size of element. It will be difficult to
describe through template.
>
>> Updated numbers are (same benchmark on same notebook, but with new
>> master, new ubuntu and later patch version) (average among 6 runs):
>>
>> master - 16135tps
>> with templated qsort - 16199tps
>> with bucket sort - 16956tps
>>
>> Difference is still measurable, but less significant. I don't know why.
>>
>> Rebased version of first patch (qsorted tamplate) is in atttach.
>
> Hm, that's a bit underwhelming. It's nice to deduplicate, but 16135tps
> -> 16199tps is barely statistically significant?
I mean bucket sort is measurably faster than both generic and templated
sort (16956 vs 16199 and 16135). So initial goal remains: to add bucket
sort in this place.
BTW, I have small change to templated version that improves sorting of
random tuples a bit (1-1.5%). Will post it a bit later with test.
> - Andres
>
With regards,
Yura.
