Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
Date
Msg-id 20180301083404.z2sbnjdaw7gxvz6x@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts  ("Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-01-28 23:02:57 +0000, Rady, Doug wrote:
> diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c
> index 31ea6ca06e..689f15a772 100644
> --- a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c
> +++ b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,13 @@
>  #include <signal.h>
>  #include <time.h>
>  #include <sys/time.h>
> -#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H
> +#ifdef PGBENCH_USE_SELECT            /* force use of select(2)? */
> +#undef HAVE_PPOLL
> +#endif
> +#ifdef HAVE_PPOLL
> +#include <poll.h>
> +#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H)
> +#define POLL_USING_SELECT

(random thing noticed while going through patches)

It strikes me as a bad idea to undefine configure selected
symbols. Postgres header might rely on them. It also strikes me as
entirely unnecessary here.

- Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add \if support
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Find additional connection service files inpg_service.conf.d directory