Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1803011121300.7903@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
List pgsql-hackers
>> -#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H
>> +#ifdef PGBENCH_USE_SELECT            /* force use of select(2)? */
>> +#undef HAVE_PPOLL
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef HAVE_PPOLL
>> +#include <poll.h>
>> +#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H)
>> +#define POLL_USING_SELECT
>
> (random thing noticed while going through patches)
>
> It strikes me as a bad idea to undefine configure selected
> symbols. Postgres header might rely on them. It also strikes me as
> entirely unnecessary here.

Yes, I though about this one but let it pass. Indeed, it would be 
sufficient to not load "poll.h" when select is forced, without undefining 
the configure setting.

-- 
Fabien.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Next
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping