Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0
Date
Msg-id 20180202100840.qydanu553sfwtddc@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-02-02 18:22:34 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> The clang that was used for bitcode was the system /usr/bin/clang,
> version 4.0.  Is it a problem that I used that for compiling the
> bitcode, but LLVM5 for JIT?  I actually tried
> CLANG=/usr/local/llvm50/bin/clang but ran into weird failures I
> haven't got to the bottom of at ThinLink time so I couldn't get as far
> as a running system.

You're using thinlto to compile pg? Could you provide what you pass to
configure for that? IIRC I tried that a while ago and ran into some
issues with us creating archives (libpgport, libpgcommon).

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null