Hi,
On 2017-09-18 18:04:36 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > Here is a patch to fix that.
>
> Here's a better one (same code, corrected commit message).
Pushed. For a second I was tempted to also replace the
palloc(sizeof(dshash_table)) with a palloc0 - but in the end it seems
actually not too bad either to be able to catch bugs like this with some
help. If you have a strong opinion either way...
Thanks,
Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
