Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoA5C4kBrrhXqkJ1X5FSfAVwPT_Ooa9SHkiLZ6nfe5w7Tg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Doug Doole <DougDoole@gmail.com> writes:
>> Looks good to me.
>> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
> Pushed.  Grepping found a few more places that should be changed to
> use these macros rather than referencing btpo_flags directly,
> so I did that.

Thank you!

> I tend to agree with Alvaro that it'd be better to get rid of
> BT_READ/BT_WRITE in favor of using the same buffer flags used
> elsewhere; but I also agree that as long as they're there we
> should use them, so I included that change as well.
>

Agreed. Thanks, again.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] valgrind vs. shared typmod registry
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query