Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree
Date
Msg-id 15777.1505767199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree  (Doug Doole <DougDoole@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small code improvement for btree  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Doug Doole <DougDoole@gmail.com> writes:
> Looks good to me.
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Pushed.  Grepping found a few more places that should be changed to
use these macros rather than referencing btpo_flags directly,
so I did that.

I tend to agree with Alvaro that it'd be better to get rid of
BT_READ/BT_WRITE in favor of using the same buffer flags used
elsewhere; but I also agree that as long as they're there we
should use them, so I included that change as well.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables