Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 20170619224938.hbwcwszgc4lu27v2@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-05 15:45:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2017-04-05 17:00:42 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> > Regarding test patch, I have corrected the test suite after David Steele's
> > comments.
> > Also, I would like to mention that a companion patch was submitted by David
> > Steele up-thread.
> > 
> > Attached the latest code and test patch.
> 
> My impression is that this'll need a couple more rounds of review. Given
> that this'll establish API we'll pretty much ever going to be able to
> change/remove, I think it'd be a bad idea to rush this into v10.
> Therefore I propose moving this to the next CF.

Craig, Vaishnavi, everyone else: Are you planning to continue to work on
this for v11?  I'm willing to do another round, but only if it's
worthwhile.

FWIW, I still think this needs a pgbench or similar example integration,
so we can actually properly measure the benefits.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REPLICA IDENTITY FULL