Re: [HACKERS] generate_series regression 9.6->10 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] generate_series regression 9.6->10
Date
Msg-id 20170524172357.tv3ti66foeaw5w3k@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] generate_series regression 9.6->10  (Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-05-24 10:09:19 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> The behaviour of generate_series seems to have changed a little, at least
> in conjunction w/ CTEs. Under 9.6 (and prior) this query returns 2127 rows,
> with no nulls:
> 
> with
> ij as ( select i, j from generate_series(1, 10) i, generate_series(1, 10)
> j),
> iijj as (select generate_series(1, i) as a, generate_series(1, j) b from ij)
> select a, b from iijj;
> 
> Under 10, it returns only 715 rows, with many nulls.

Right, that's expected - we probably need to expand on that in the
release notes.  Before v10 targetlist with multiple SRFs were evaluated
using on a "least common multiple" logic.  I.e. if you have SELECT
generate_series(1,2), generate_series(1,4); once the first SRFs is
exhausted it was restarted.  Only once all SRFs stopped returning rows
at the same time, things were stopped.  Going on forward, once either
SRF stops returning rows, it'll return NULL until all SRFs are
exhausted.

Makes sense?  Is that a problem for you? If so, what do you use the LCM
logic for in practical terms?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] generate_series regression 9.6->10