Hi,
When I started writing this, there were the following reamining CF
items, minus bugfix ones which aren't bound by the code freeze.
I think it makes sense to go through those and see whether it's
realistic to commit any of them.
Ready for Committer:
Add GUCs for predicate lock promotion thresholds:
- claimed by Kevin, should be easy enough
initdb configurable wal_segment_size
- parts have been committed
- significantly derailed by segment naming discussion
- possibly committable if we decide to skip the naming bit? But also a bit late given that it touches some quite
sensitivecode.
Create fdw_outerpath for foreign
- haven't really followed discussion
- only marked as ready-for-committer 2017-04-04
Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
- hm, maybe? Will take a look.
Unique Joins
- Tom's discussing things with David, not sure.
Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw
- claimed by Robert?
postgres_fdw: support parameterized foreign joins
- think that depends on fdw_outerpath?
Waiting on Author:
SQL statements statistics counter view (pg_stat_sql)
- the code doesn't look quite ready
- don't think we quite have design agreement, e.g. I don't like where it's hooked into query execution
Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
- fair number of people don't think it's ready for v10.
- can't move to next fest because it's waiting-on-author, which doesn't allow that. Doesn't strike me as a useful
restriction.
BRIN optimize memory allocation
- I think Alvaro has indicated that he wants to take care of that?
Indexes with Included Columns (was Covering + unique indexes)
- Don't think concerns about #columns on truncated tuples have been addressed. Should imo be returned-with-feedback.
Needs-Review:
Better estimate merging for duplicate vars in clausesel.c
- has been submitted pretty late (2017-02-24) and discussion is ongoing
- I'm inclined to punt on this one to the next release, previous proposal along that line got some pushback
new plpgsql extra_checks
- Winner of the "most opaque CF title" award
- hasn't received a whole lot of review
- don't think we're even close to having design agreement
Generic type subscripting
- still some review back and forth
- probably should be punted
Any comments?
Greetings,
Andres
