On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 07:01:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I personally, and I know of a bunch of other regular contributors, find
> > context diffs very hard to read. Besides general dislike, for things
> > like regression test output context diffs are just not well suited.
>
> Personally, I disagree completely. Unified diffs are utterly unreadable
> for anything beyond trivial cases of small well-separated changes.
>
> It's possible that regression failure diffs will usually fall into that
> category, but I'm not convinced.
For reading patches, I frequently use both formats. Overall, I perhaps read
unified 3/4 of the time and context 1/4 of the time.
For regression diffs, I use PG_REGRESS_DIFF_OPTS=-u and have never converted a
regression diff to context form. Hence, +1 for the proposed change.
