Re: [HACKERS] parallel bitmapscan isn't exercised in regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] parallel bitmapscan isn't exercised in regression tests
Date
Msg-id 20170406204355.b4owz73rv2zlkpxs@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] parallel bitmapscan isn't exercised in regression tests  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-06 10:00:32 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sure I can do that, In attached patch, I only fixed the problem of not
> > executing the bitmap test.  Now, I will add few cases to cover other
> > parts especially rescan and prefetching logic.
> 
> I have added two test cases to cover rescan, prefetch and lossy pages
> logic for parallel bitmap.  I have removed the existing case because
> these two new cases will be enough to cover that part as well.
> 
> Now, nodeBitmapHeapScan.c has 95.5% of line coverage.

Great!  Pushed.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TPC-H Q20 from 1 hour to 19 hours!
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallel explain analyze support not exercised