On 2017-03-16 17:28:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> > "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Andres> Seems like a good thing to include in the tree. I'd be ok with
> > Andres> just including the simpler version in the relevant branches.
>
> > Ok.
>
> I dunno ... there doesn't seem to be any meaningful portability risk
> here, and it's not clear to me what class of future bug this test might
> hope to catch. Do we really need to spend test cycles forevermore on
> this?
We had previous bugs around this, so it doesn't seem like a bad idea to
test it. Also it should be so short in comparison to the rest of the
isolationtests that it won't matter wrt total runtime?
- Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
