Re: [HACKERS] Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host?
Date
Msg-id 20161223224842.m2iezvourbdf5bs6@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> ... and miraculously it has fixed itself.

And it failed again today, once.

Today I noticed that it's running gcc 4.5.0.  But for the 4.5 branch,
the GCC guys put out a few releases before abandoning it, and there are
some compiler segmentation faults fixed in some of these releases,
visible here:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.4

I think it'd be worthwhile to upgrade to the latest in that branch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Incautious handling of overlength identifiers
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Remove lower limit on checkpoint_timeout?