On 12/23/2016 12:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> So what to do? We could run around and fix these individual cases
>> and call it good, but if we do, I will bet a very fine dinner that
>> more such errors will sneak in before long. Seems like we need a
>> coding convention that discourages just randomly treating a C string
>> as a valid value of type NAME. Not sure how to get there though.
>
> An alternative worth considering, especially for the back branches,
> is simply to remove the Assert in hashname(). That would give us
> the behavior that non-developers see anyway, which is that these
> functions always fail to match overlength names, whether or not
> the names would have matched after truncation. Trying to apply
> truncation more consistently could be left as an improvement
> project for later.
That sounds reasonable to me.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
