Re: Indirect indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Indirect indexes
Date
Msg-id 20161020133923.bwduqwzc3vh2wb77@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indirect indexes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Indirect indexes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Indirect indexes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Just to clarify, if a feature improves performance by 1%, but is enabled
> by default, that is 10x more useful across our entire user base as the
> feature numbers listed above, 1% vs 0.1%.

Great.  But not all users are alike.  We have big profile users that
write blog posts that get echoed all over the world who would benefit
from things that perhaps other users would not benefit that much from.

> Also, it seems indirect indexes would be useful for indexing columns
> that are not updated frequently on tables that are updated frequently,
> and whose primary key is not updated frequently.  That's quite a logic
> problem for users to understand.

I don't think we should be optimizing only for dumb users.  In any case,
updating primary key values is very rare; some would say it never
happens.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Indirect indexes