At Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:14:23 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote in
<CAB7nPqSf8dBndoKT5DeR6FpzDUSuXN_g7uWNPQuN_A_sEwB-uw@mail.gmail.com>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > Sorry for no response, but, the answer is yes. We could be able
> > to avoid the problem by managing execution state for every
> > node. But it needs an additional flag in *State structs and
> > manipulating on the way shuttling up and down around the
> > execution tree.
>
> Moved to next CF.
Thank you.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
