Re: Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT5Wa5G5v32FLe_pJGs-hz5_6Dz2KeWdR0TLbbykADQXA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I removed DEPENDENCY_IGNORE.  Does the following look good or am I still
>> missing something?
>
> You missed your commit message, but otherwise looks fine.

I have moved this patch to next CF because that's fresh, but switched
the patch as "waiting on author". Be careful, the patch was in "needs
review".
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: raw output from copy