Re: Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id 378ecca4-303c-b5cb-ba1f-a0ee5e545bf2@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/10/03 13:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> I removed DEPENDENCY_IGNORE.  Does the following look good or am I still
>>> missing something?
>>
>> You missed your commit message, but otherwise looks fine.
> 
> I have moved this patch to next CF because that's fresh, but switched
> the patch as "waiting on author". Be careful, the patch was in "needs
> review".

Thanks Michael.  I was going to post the patch addressing Robert's
comments today, which I will anyway.  Then I will switch the status back
to "Needs Review", albeit as part of the next CF.

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlogdump follow into the future
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch