Re: increasing the default WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id 20160825025441.sjieycl3c5baoaqm@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-08-24 22:33:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Possibly it would make sense for this to be configurable at initdb
> > time instead of requiring a recompile;
> 
> ... but I think this is just folly.  You'd have to do major amounts
> of work to keep, eg, slave servers on the same page as the master
> about what the segment size is.

Don't think it'd actually be all that complicated, we already verify
the compatibility of some things.  But I'm doubtful it's worth it, and
I'm also rather doubtful that it's actually without overhead.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size