Hi,
On 2016-08-22 16:20:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2016-08-17 17:41:28 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Tom, do you think this is roughly going in the right direction?
>
> I've not had time to look at this patch, I'm afraid. If you still
> want me to, I can make time in a day or so.
That'd greatly be appreciated. I think polishing the POC up to
committable patch will be a considerable amount of work, and I'd like
design feedback before that.
> > I'm working on these. Atm ExecMakeTableFunctionResult() resides in
> > execQual.c - I'm inlining it into nodeFunctionscan.c now, because
> > there's no other callers, and having it separate seems to bring no
> > benefit.
>
> > Please speak soon up if you disagree.
>
> I think ExecMakeTableFunctionResult was placed in execQual.c because
> it seemed to belong there alongside the support for SRFs in tlists.
> If that's going away then there's no good reason not to move the logic
> to where it's used.
Cool, then we agree.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
